ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Sars-CoV-2 infection can lead to severe pulmonary impairment at all ages, however, the best therapy in children is not established. Our objective is to discuss a severe pulmonary case in a pediatric oncology patient who presented good clinical evolution and the therapeutic measures chosen in its management. METHOD(S): Case report and literature review. RESULT(S): A 2-year-old girl undergoing chemotherapy for acute lymphocytic leukemia had received cytarabine and methotrexate one week before being admitted to the ward for febrile neutropenia, identified with Sars-Cov-2 infection by RT-PCR. Referred to pediatric intensive care on day 3 of symptoms when she was prostrate and antibiotics switched to a broader spectrum. On day 8 of symptoms she rapidly developed respiratory failure and required mechanical ventilation at high parameters, CT scan showed lesions in ground glass in 75% of the lung parenchyma. On day 9, she was still feverish and showed altered inflammatory tests, such as ferritin 4492 mcg/L D-dimer 5909 ng/dL CRP 28 mg/ dL. Cardiac, hepatic and renal functions remained stable. At that moment, the patient received gammaglobulin 2g/kg in a single dose and methylprednisolone 2mg/kg/day for 5 days. Substantial improvement was observed 48 hours after the introduction of anti-inflammatory therapy, allowing for weaning and extubation after 7 days of mechanical ventilation. 72 hours after extubation, she was discharged home, breathing normally on room air. CONCLUSION(S): Severe Sars-Cov-2 lung infection in a pediatric oncology patient with markedly high inflammatory tests was treated with anti-inflammatory therapies such as steroids and gammaglobulin, with rapid and favorable recovery (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Objective: to identify the occurrence of the factors associated with: (1) suspected infection by the virus that causes COVID-19;(2) absenteeism at work due to suspected infection or diagnosis of infection by the virus that causes COVID-19;and (3) performance of tests for the screening of infection by the virus that causes COVID-19 among Nursing professionals. Method: a cross-sectional study conducted with 890 nurses in June and July 2020. The associations between the outcomes and the other variables were explored using Poisson regression models with robust variance estimators. Results: occurrence of the outcomes was (1) 35.5%, (2) 16.2% and (3) 38.2%, respectively. For suspected infection, associations were observed with assessment of the working conditions as deficient (RR: 1.55;95% CI: 1.21-1.99) and with lack of Personal Protective Equipment (RR: 1.27;95% CI: 1.06-1.51). Absenteeism at work was associated with the adoption of moderate social distancing (RR: 1.49;95% CI: 1.00-2.21). To perform the screening tests, the associations with links to outpatient (RR: 2.47;95% CI: 1.52-4.01) and hospital (RR: 2.49;95% CI: 1.60-3.89) services stood out, in addition to direct contact with patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses (RR: 1.65;95% CI: 1.33-2.05). Conclusion: despite the high occurrence of suspected infection and a considerable incidence of absenteeism at work among professionals from the various services under study, disparity in access to the screening tests was evidenced, especially with regard to the professionals who work in Primary Care. © 2021, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. All rights reserved.